How can personality influence effective communication?

How can personality influence effective communication?

2 months ago

Solution 1

Guest Guest #9353
2 months ago

These are some of the ways where personality influence effective communication

 

Introverts, are people turning all their feelings towards themselves. It is being passive or observant and does nothing to what is happening around him. Bully, is a person who enjoys in pestering inferior people. When there is conflict, he becomes aggressive on his surroundings, asking for fights. Extravert is a person who likes the company of other people, when there is conflict, extraverts becomes peacemakers.

 

📚 Related Questions

Question
Which of the following would make the most significant contrast to the women who lived with bound feet and who rarely left their homes or Chinatown? A. More liberated American women who worked outside of the home. B. Americanized Chinese children who learned American ways from the public school system. C. The Chinese settlers who came to Ellis Island and were not detained. D. The women and children living in culturally united communities in modern times.
Solution 1

Answer:

A. More liberated American women who worked outside of the home.

Explanation:

The most significant contrast to women that stayed at home or never let chinatown would be a liberated american woman that has a job outisde the house, this is a contrast since the chinese woman that never left their homes or china town were basically living in a controlled culture and society that made a little chinese bubble for them, they didn´t have the need to educate themselves or culturally fit the american society, while the liberal ideals and freedom would influence a more liberal american woman and that would make them both have very different points of view on what the women´s role on society is.

Solution 2
A. More liberated American women who worked outside of the home.
Question
Read this excerpt from "Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk." Despite these misgivings, I do not see how we can do anything but continue to prosecute the war. We can and should limit the violence and the suffering being inflicted on the civilians as much as possible, but for whatever reasons, successive Administrations in Washington have carried the commitment in Vietnam to the point where it would be very difficult to prevent any precipitate retreat from degenerating into a rout. If the United States were to disengage from Vietnam under adverse conditions, I believe that the resulting political and psychological shockwaves might undermine our entire position in Southeast Asia. Which statement best describes the paradox in this excerpt?
Solution 1
In this excerpt, we can best observe the paradox in "...successive Administrations in Washington have carried the commitment in Vietnam to the point where it would be very difficult to prevent any precipitate retreat from degenerating into a rout.". This sentence expresses how, while aborting the war is necessary for peace, doing so in then-present circumstances would have created more harm than good.
Solution 2

Answer:

The correct option is C;)have a nice day

Explanation:

Question
Discuss five factors that could hamper effective communication
Solution 1

There are several factors that hampers effective communication and some of them are:

  • Not being satisfied with one's job.
  • Inability to listen to others.
  • Lack of transparency and trust.
  • Communication style.
  • Cultural differences.

An effective communication

This is defined as the ability to convey information to another efficiently and effectively.

Not being satisfied with one's job: When one has lost interest in his job, there is a possibility of non-effective communication.

Inability to listen to others:  One cannot engage with another in communication if they are not listening to them.

Lack of transparency and trust: Lack of trust sure breeds ineffective communication.

Communication style: The style and approach of communication may differ from person to person and creates an ineffective communication.

Cultural differences: When there is a cultural and language barrier, there is ineffective communication.

Read more about communication here:

brainly.com/question/26152499

Solution 2

Ineffective communication leads to conflict, which happens when either one of the individuals have misunderstanding or are reaching over the same goal.  (1) not talking things out, (2) not listening to the side of the other, (3) close-minded, (4) not explaining well, (5) not facing your responsibilities whether good or bad.

Question
The most common position for the main idea in a paragraph is _____. last middle first
Solution 1
The most common position for the main idea in a paragraph is the middle (body paragraph)
Solution 2

Answer:

Middle

Explanation:

Trying to help everyone!

Question
What is Valery’s point about Hamlet picking up Leonardo’s skull?
Solution 1

Answer:  The correct answer is :  Leonardo did not intend that his inventions cause any harm.

Explanation:   For Valery and Hamlet the ghosts represent uncertainty. Valery was a modernist writer, reflected reality and wrote from personal perspectives. She used universal experiences.

Solution 2

The point that Valery was trying to make about Hamlet picking up Learnardo's skull is that it was not Leonardo's intention for the invention to harm people.

Who is Valey in the above excerpt?

Paul Valery is the author of Crises of the Mind. The central theme of the essay or article Xrays the irrational actions of Central Europe at that time.

A theme is a principal thought that an article wishes to convey.

Learn more about Valery at:

brainly.com/question/4005885

#SPJ2


Question
Lines 502–513: Explain why you think Miller puts stage directions in quotes. What is revealed about the character of Elizabeth in these moments? The Crucible Act 2 cite text evidence and and what lines the evidence is found link to pages: https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/cbf2f452-05de-49fb-a535-dd72311cd109
Solution 1
In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, act 2, lines 502–513, the author includes "reasonably" and "conceding" as stage directions between quotation marks, differently from directions included for other characters. This may indicate that these attitudes are apparent to point out the difference between Elizabeth's apparent reaction and her actual feelings regarding the situation at hand. In lines 520-523 we can observe the writer include directions without quotation marks when Proctor goes for his rifle and she reacts with fear (trembling, fearfully) as she says "Oh, how unwillingly!". By the author's lack of quotation marks here, we could infer that Elizabeth's reaction here was not measured or masked in any way.
Question
Lines 460–461: Infer who Elizabeth thinks “she” is in her statement in line 460. The Crucible Act 2 cite text evidence and and what lines the evidence is found link to pages: https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/cbf2f452-05de-49fb-a535-dd72311cd109
Solution 1
In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, act 2, Abigail has convinced the town that she can identify witches and has mentioned the name of Elizabeth as one of those who practice witchcraft. Elizabeth is John Proctor's (Abigail's love interest) wife. After questioning Mary over that day's events in Salem, she reveals that Elizabeth's name has been mentioned, and she (Mary) defended her. Elizabeth then understood that, although Mary was not able to reveal who had made the accusation, Abigail had mentioned her in order to take her place in Proctor's life. After telling John about her theory of she wanting her [Elizabeth] death in order to take the place of John's wife, in lines 471-474 she tells John that she must go and talk Abigail out of it, as she is doing these things because of the promise he made to her in bed.

Therefore, your best answer is Abigail.
Question
Lines 460–461: Infer who Elizabeth thinks “she” is in her statement in line 460. The Crucible Act 2 cite text evidence and and what lines the evidence is found link to pages: https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/cbf2f452-05de-49fb-a535-dd72311cd109
Solution 1
In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, act 2, Abigail has convinced the town that she can identify witches and has mentioned the name of Elizabeth as one of those who practice witchcraft. Elizabeth is John Proctor's (Abigail's love interest) wife. After questioning Mary over that day's events in Salem, she reveals that Elizabeth's name has been mentioned, and she (Mary) defended her. Elizabeth then understood that, although Mary was not able to reveal who had made the accusation, Abigail had mentioned her in order to take her place in Proctor's life. After telling John about her theory of she wanting her [Elizabeth] death in order to take the place of John's wife, in lines 471-474 she tells John that she must go and talk Abigail out of it, as she is doing these things because of the promise he made to her in bed.
Therefore, your best answer is Abigail.
Question
Affixes include prefixes and suffixes. a. True b. False
Solution 1

Answer:

Its true dont listen to that guy.

Explanation:

Solution 2
Well i think it is false

hope i helped
Question
Lines 419–431: How does the event described in these lines qualify as a plot complication? The Crucible Act 2 cite text evidence and and what lines the evidence is found link to pages: https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/cbf2f452-05de-49fb-a535-dd72311cd109
Solution 1
Taking into consideration that a plot complication is when a further detail is revealed regarding the conflict. Said detail can be directly related to the conflict or simply be an inconvenience representing further difficulty to solving the central conflict. In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, act 2, lines 419–431, Mary is defending herself from John Proctor's threat to whip her by her argument on how she saved Elizabeth's life (Proctor's wife) by being present in Salem on that day. The fact that Elizabeth has been accused is a complication because it shows a new detail about the central conflict of the play. If the main conflict is revealing the fake nature of the witch trials, the complication revealed here is that Abigail is the one accusing Elizabeth (considered an honorable woman) to take her place as Proctor's wife (lines 490-499).